AI Red Team & Compliance

Full adversarial red team engagement against your AI systems, plus a compliance gap analysis for EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF — with an executive summary ready for the board.

Red Team & Compliance
$12,000
fixed fee

Full adversarial red team engagement against your AI systems, plus a compliance gap analysis for EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF — with an executive summary ready for the board. Multi-step attacker simulation (tool injection, RCE, data exfil). EU AI Act + NIST AI RMF gap analysis. Post-mitigation verification testing. Compliance alignment mapping. ~3 weeks delivery.

⚔️

Adversarial Prompt & Jailbreak Testing

Systematic testing for direct and indirect prompt injection, multi-turn jailbreaks, role-play escapes, encoding/obfuscation bypasses, and model-specific vulnerabilities across all model touchpoints.

🔧

Agent Tool Misuse Scenarios

Simulate privilege escalation, lateral movement, and unintended actions via tool injection. Test HTTP call SSRF, filesystem access, code execution, database queries, and custom tool chains.

📋

EU AI Act Gap Analysis

Map your AI system against EU AI Act requirements: risk classification, data governance, transparency obligations, human oversight, accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity requirements, and post-market monitoring.

🏛️

NIST AI RMF Alignment Report

Govern, Map, Measure, Manage — assess your AI risk management practices against NIST AI RMF 1.0. Prioritised action items with maturity scoring and evidence requirements for each subcategory.

Post-Mitigation Verification Testing

After you implement fixes, we re-test the original findings to confirm remediation. Regression testing ensures new defenses don't introduce new attack surface. Verification report included.

📊

Executive Summary + Board-Ready Deck

Non-technical executive summary with risk ratings, business impact, and investment priorities. 10-slide board deck with compliance posture, remediation roadmap, and competitive benchmarking.

What You Receive

Adversarial test report with severity ratings + reproducible PoCs
EU AI Act gap analysis with article-level mapping
NIST AI RMF alignment assessment (Govern/Map/Measure/Manage)
Post-mitigation verification testing (re-test after fixes)
Executive summary + 10-slide board deck
~3 weeks delivery from kickoff

How It Works

From scope to board deck in three weeks. Rigorous, repeatable, and designed for regulatory scrutiny.

1
Scope & Rules

Kickoff & Rules of Engagement

Define target systems, attack constraints, data handling, communication protocol, and escalation paths. Compliance scope (EU AI Act, NIST, both) confirmed.

2
Reconnaissance

Attack Surface Mapping

Enumerate all model endpoints, agent tools, data flows, integration points, and trust boundaries. Build the attack matrix with compliance control mapping.

3
Execution

Red Team Engagement

Execute multi-step attack chains: prompt injection → tool misuse → data exfil → privilege escalation. Document every step with timestamps, inputs, outputs, and evidence.

4
Compliance Mapping

Gap Analysis & Reporting

Map findings to EU AI Act articles and NIST AI RMF subcategories. Produce technical report, executive summary, and board deck. Readout call with leadership.

5
Verify

Post-Mitigation Verification

After you implement fixes, we re-test the original findings. Confirm remediation, check for regressions, issue verification addendum. Close the loop.

Common Questions

Do you test production or staging?
Staging for invasive tests (tool misuse, data exfil, RCE). Production-safe tests (UI prompt injection) can run in prod with read-only scopes. We agree on rules upfront and use feature flags.
What if you find a critical vulnerability during testing?
Immediate pause. We notify your designated contact within 1 hour with details and suggested mitigation. Testing resumes only after you acknowledge and approve.
Can you test open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, etc.)?
Yes. The attack surface differs (no hidden system prompt, but model weights accessible). We adapt the matrix — focus shifts to weight extraction, backdoor triggers, and supply chain risks.
Does this satisfy EU AI Act conformity assessment?
This is a gap analysis and adversarial test — not a formal conformity assessment by a notified body. However, the evidence package (test results, risk assessments, mitigations) directly supports your technical documentation for Annex IV and conformity assessment.
What's the difference between this and the $8K Guardrails?
Guardrails = preventive controls you run continuously. Red Team = adversarial validation that those controls (and your overall posture) actually work. Red Team includes compliance mapping Guardrails doesn't. Most clients do Guardrails first, then Red Team to validate.

Run your Red Team

Stop assuming your defenses hold. Get a professional adversarial engagement with compliance mapping and a board-ready deck.

Purchase $12,000 Red Team → Book Free Consultation First Post-mitigation verification included · Board-ready deck · ~3 weeks delivery